Octopus Energy Referral Link £50 Credit

Octopus Energy Referral Link £50 Credit – No code needed

Octopus Energy referral link for £50 credit when switching. A code or voucher is not needed. Octopus Energy is one of the best energy suppliers in the UK. If you sign up with them via the link, they will credit you with £50 which you will then use as a discount towards future energy costs.


The link takes you directly to the Octopus Energy website. If you sign up without a referral link you will lose out on the £50. Signing up is easy, you don’t need a discount code or promo voucher, all you do is go to the Octopus Energy website using the link I have provided. Once you have clicked on the link you can check that you really are on the referrals section of the Octopus Energy website.

I have been with Octopus Energy for about seven years. They are not the cheapest but they offer good service. If you contact them via email they will reply within a few hours. I find their support very helpful.

In order to compare energy suppliers it’s useful to find the kWh prices for both gas and electricity and the daily standing charge price. If you just use the suppliers website for comparison, they will usually give you misleading information on how much you can save. All the suppliers will claim that you can save by switching to them!

Some Other UK Energy Suppliers

I compared Octopus to some other energy suppliers and here are the results:

Flow Energy: seems quite good, slightly more expensive than my current Octopus Energy tariff

Ovo Energy: I contacted their support who were very helpful. Their energy prices are surprisingly high.

Avro Energy: their prices are very competitive

Bulb Energy: reasonable prices

Utility Warehouse: I contacted their support and they were slow to reply compared to other energy suppliers

Utilita: have an unusual pricing scheme, where they have no standing charge but they charge extra for the first units used each day. This makes it difficult to compare their prices

First Utility: I looked at review sites and saw bad reviews, so I didn’t consider them

E.On: one of the big six, so I didn’t seriously consider them as I prefer smaller suppliers. Their prices are considerably more expensive than the tariff I’m currently on with Octopus Energy

British Gas: supply electricity as well as gas but I don’t want to use them. Their website was buggy when I tried to use it.

Overall, I’m happy to stay with Octopus Energy, as good support is important.

As I mentioned, they have a referral scheme, where existing Octopus Energy customers can give potential new customers a referral link. If the new customer signs up via the link he/she is credited with £50 by Octopus Energy towards future energy bills.

Here is my Octopus Energy referral link:  https://share.octopus.energy/lemon-snow-194

The link takes you directly to the Octopus Energy website. Signing up with Octopus is easy. They will organise the switch from your existing energy supplier. It will take about three weeks before Octopus Energy becomes your new energy supplier. This is the standard length of time to change supplier.

I hope you use this link to sign up to switch and claim your £50 credit against future energy costs.  You can sign up for a normal or eco-green energy tariff.

octopus energy referral link save energy supplier code voucher

Use this link now to save £50 and get a low cost energy deal from Octopus:


It takes you to the referrals section of the Octopus Energy website.

They are currently doing their Winter Workout with energy saving tips and prizes.

The link is guaranteed to work – no vouchers or codes required.

Intel XDK – a nice development environment for mobile apps

Intel XDK

I’ve started using Intel XDK which I find a nice environment for developing mobile applications.

It’s based on developing mobile apps using existing web technologies, such as HTML5, Javascript and CSS.

This has the advantage that the apps can easily be deployed on different platforms, such as iOS for the iPad / iPhone, Android, Windows Phone, etc and you don’t have to learn specialized languages such as Objective-C for iOS.

The environment includes Phonegap/Cordova, which allows the apps to access the mobile device’s hardware (such as camera, accelerometer, etc) and its software (such as contacts, file system, etc).

The environment includes a graphical application for the design of GUIs, which, unsurprisingly is called “App Designer”. When a new project is started with App Designer, the user is given the choice of one of four frameworks (App Framework, Bootstrap, jQuery Mobile, Topcoat) for the GUI elements you wish to use.

The environment is well presented with a good help, including videos and forums. The Intel XDK is obviously being actively developed by Intel, as can be seen from the forums. The Intel developers themselves often answer the questions on the forums.

If you would like me to develop an application or other technical projects, you can contact me.


Canny Compare – Find Booking Information for Hotels, Guest Houses and Rentals

Europe Airpost – an airline to avoid

Europe Airpost – an airline to avoid

We recently went to Greece with the airline Europe Airpost and it was an awful experience.

Coming back from Greece the aircraft was delayed for a couple of hours due to technical problems. When it finally arrived we thought that there would be no further problems and that we would soon be leaving. We were wrong.

The pilot started the engines and then shut them down again and announced more technical problems. After starting and stopping the engines several more times they decided to depart. It was dark and raining hard. The departure was awful. We weren’t sure that the old aircraft was going to make it. The aircraft creaked in a frightening way. Even the flight attendants seemed worried. Nobody spoke during the whole flight to the next island. All the passengers seemed worried. I fly a lot and I was worried too.

Europe Airpost seems to be an airline run on a shoe-string with old aircraft, such as 737s.

I think this airline is a disaster waiting to happen.  You should avoid it.


Software Consultant, Real-Time Embedded, Test, Quality Assurance, DO178

Software Consultant, real-time embedded software (also MISRA, “DO-178B”)

I am a software consultant, currently working from my office in France.

I offer consulting services in the areas of software requirements, software design, programming, testing, quality assurance, validation, documentation and translation.

My experience is mainly in the area of technical software, but I offer my services for all types of software.

My experience has been in avionics (military upgrade programmes for EADS), communication systems (first at Racal and later at Rohde and Schwarz in Munich).

I worked in several areas at Siemens in Munich, including an air traffic control system, vehicle navigation using GPS, network systems where I worked on an ATM-Switch, in particular the integration of the pSOS real-time operating system.

Recently I worked at MTU Aero Engines on a project to test the software of the engines of the A400M military aircraft. This involved unit testing of the software to “DO-178B” Level-A.

Have experience with many different tools for software development. In the area of software requirements this is mainly DOORS, a requirements tool from IBM.

In the area of software design and architecture I have experience with the UML tools Enterprise Architect, Rational Rose and Rhapsody.

For software development I have experience with Microsoft Visual Studio, Eclipse, Green Hills Multi and others.

I also have a lot of experience of debugging, both on host computers and with the Lauterbach “trace-32” emulator.

I have experience with “DO-178” (also written DO178 or DO178B). This is an important specification for the procedure of developing software for airborne systems. It is also applicable to many other military systems.

I have used tools for software test and quality assurance. These tools include the tools from LDRA and VectorCast. I have used these tools for testing according to “DO-178B” (DO178B).

There is now a new version of the “DO178” specification which is “DO178C”. This DO178C was introduced recently and is a long overdue update to DO178B.

Have also been involved with traceability for “DO-178B”. This involves tracing of requirements to code, to tests, to design, etc.

I have experience of software quality assurance for DO178B. This also involved using the tools from LDRA. I also have quality assurance (QA) experience using tools such as PC-Lint.

I also have a lot of experience with technical documentation, ranging from writing software requirements to test procedures. I can also offer my services for translation of technical documents from German into English.

I lived in Germany for 24 years (and I miss living there!).

I offer contract software services, mainly from my home office with occasional visits to the customer. If you are interested, please use the contact form.







Phonegap – develop cross platform mobile apps the easy way

I had been investigating how to develop software for mobile applications. I took a look at the development environment XCODE and Objective-C for Apple (iOS) devices.

At first I thought that developing code in Objective-C should be easy, because my programming background is in C/C++.  But on closer inspection this turned out not to be the case. Objective-C is significantly different to C and developing applications using it involves a steep learning curve.

There is no point in developing an application for the iPhone or iPad if you don’t put it in the Apple App Store. The process for getting an application accepted by Apple is not so easy.

What would happen if you spent months learning Objective-C and developing an application and then Apple reject your application to have the app put in the App store?

In that case you would be really up the creek without a paddle, because you would have nothing that you could reuse. The only option would be to throw it all away.

There is an alternative to using XCODE and Objective-C and it’s called Phonegap.

Wait, things get even better. Phonegap allows you to create apps for all of the popular mobile platforms including iOS and Android and the less popular platforms such as Blackberry and Windows Phone.

There are even more positive things. Phonegap is completely free and is relatively easy to use because it allows you to program with the same technologies used for web site development. These technologies are HTML, CSS and Javascript.

It gets even better: because you are using these technologies, all of the plug-ins which are available for website development are immediately available for your mobile application.

This means that software such as jQuery, jQuery Mobile, Moo Tools, Dojo, Prototype, YUI, etc are immediately available for use in your application.

Phonegap is available for download at www.phonegap.com

Of course, if you want to develop mobile applications for iOS, you still need a MAC and XCODE, but the nut is now easier to crack.

Applications developed with Phonegap are accepted by Apple in their review of applications for the App Store. It’s possible that they could change this, but I think that it’s unlikely.

The disadvantages of Phonegap. Not many, but your application will probably run a bit slower than a native application, so it’s probably not the direction to take to develop games apps, but apart from that it seems like a great solution.

If you develop an application with Phonegap and it doesn’t get accepted into the Apple App Store, it’s not the end of the world, because the same code can be used for Android and other devices and with different CSS styling it can be used as a web page.

Note also that HTML5 is the norm if you are taking this direction, so you have to be careful if you want to write code that works both on mobile devices and websites which could be accessed by those using older browsers which do not support HTML5.

Phonegap makes it easy to access the mobile device’s lower level features (camera, accelerometer, file system, network, etc) in an easy an generic way by calls to Javascript functions.

If you would like me to develop a Phonegap application for you, I would be pleased to hear from you.






Bouygues Telecom Bbox are terrible: avoid them

Bouygues Telecom and their terrible service

We use a telephone service provider in France called Bouygues Telecom.  They are absolutely terrible. We have their ADSL box which they call the Bbox. It has been broken for the last six weeks! We have been without telephone and internet for six weeks. Their service is really bad. We phone them nearly every day to ask about the status of the problem, but they don’t seem to know what to do. If you phone them you have to wait and wait before you can speak to anyone. This is presumably because of the large number of people calling to complain.

So, if you live in France and are thinking of using Bouygues Telecom, you should think again. You will regret it if you use this company. If this article just stops a few people from starting new contracts with Bouygues it will have been worth writing it.

Companies in France are notoriously lazy and slow, but Bouygues Telecom is the worst I have come across.

Bouygues pronounce their name something like “bwig”, but unfortunately they don’t just have a ridiculous name, they have ridiculously bad service too.

We are going to cancel our contract with them. Currently investigating alternatives such as SFR, Orange and Free.

Bouygues have a shop in the town were we live. I went there to ask if they could help, but they said they could not. You have to call their useless hotline and waste lots of time.

Update: it’s now five weeks since our Bbox stopped working and still no help from Bouygues Telecom. Calling them has become a daily ritual.

Je ne recommande pas Bouygues Telecom, évitez !!!!

Bouygues Telecom and the technician who did not come

It’s now six weeks without telephone and internet. I thought things were getting better, because last Friday Bouygues said that they would send a technician to our house on Monday morning at 9 am. Things are looking good, I thought. However, 9 am came and went without a technician. He didn’t come and he Bouygues sent no message to say that he was no longer coming. I waited at home for him all day.

It’s now Tuesday and I made my daily call to Bouygues Telecom. I called their hotline. After one hour and fifteen minutes somebody answered. I asked about the technician. They offered no apologies and said that the earliest possible date is now Friday morning. I calmly told them that we have been without telephone and internet for six weeks, but they did not care.

Update: it’s now Friday and the technician did not come. I was not very surprised.

Bouygues Telecom and the worst excuse ever

As you can imagine, we are going to cancel our contract with Bouygues Telecom. In the contract it states that if the telephone/internet have been out of service for a month, we have the right to cancel the contract without penalties. As this is the case, we asked them to confirm this. Their answer was incredible: they said that they do an automated testing of the line and their records show that two weeks ago, for about 2 hours there was a working connection. For this reason, we have no right to cancel the contract without penalties, because the line has to be completely non functional for the whole month. Sigh…..

Changed to Orange Telecom

We changed to Orange Telecom and are very happy with them.

We are very pleased to have got rid of Bouygues, the worst company in France.

Microsoft Expression Web 4 is now free

The application Microsoft Expression Web 4 is now available as a free download.

Download Expression Web 4

I only realized this when I was recently googling around for a suitable IDE for doing some web development. I had looked at a number of products, but hadn’t found any of them really suitable.

I tried out Aptana Studio which is an Eclipse based IDE. I don’t like Eclipse much anyway, although I know several programmers who think it’s great. Aptana doesn’t seem to offer any real advantages over using Eclipse with the plugins for web development.

I also had a look at NetBeans which seems a good environment for the serious Java programmer. But, although I like Java, I’m going to do web development for the traditional environment using JavaScript and PHP.

One of my favourite IDEs for web development is PhpDesigner which I bought a while ago. Although it’s called PhpDesigner it’s not just for development of PHP code, so its name is a bit unfortunate, but it’s a great application. It’s not free but it’s low price.

Most web development professionals use Adobe Dreamweaver, but that’s rather expensive just for doing a bit of web development.

JavaScript libraries

When using Javascript there are several libraries available, so that you don’t have to start programming from scratch.

The most popular of these is jQuery. I have also been taking a look at a library called Dojo, which seems good and is well documented. However, it’s almost essential these days that the IDE supports automated code completion (intellisense) and I tried to add this to Aptana studio, but it was out of date. Expression Web supports jQuery intellisense, but not Dojo intellisense. I tried jQuery intellisense in Expression Web and it worked straight away, so that’s the environment I’m going to use.

If you are interested in reading more, refer to my main page at www.garthwaite.info





Why you should subcontract more software development

Most companies develop their software in-house using a team of engineers. Your company should probably subcontract more of its development work.

Many managers like it that way; they can see whether the team members are working and they like the fact that their colleagues can see that the manager is responsible for a large team.

However, it’s often not an efficient way to work. The teams are often made to work in an open plan office (or cubicles in America) where everyone bothers everyone else, with conversations, telephone calls, meetings, etc.

It doesn’t have to be this way. Some of the work can be sub-contracted to engineers such as myself, working at their own premises. The contract engineer can then get on with the work each day, with no travelling time to work and few disturbances. Of course, this means that the work is judged by results, not by the amount of time, like a team member in the office.

The two major problems with software development projects are that they are often over budget and are delivered late. Large companies often accept this situation – but there are alternatives. If some of the work is sub-contracted, it’s possible to specify a fixed delivery date for each work package. The company also has more control over the costs.

There are a few preconditions for successful subcontracting:

  • has to be a certain level of trust between the contractor and the company
  • it has to be the sort of work which can be performed externally
  • it can’t be classified (secret) development
  • the manager has to be prepared to write a statement of work
  • the contractor has to do the work
  • the company has to pay on time

Visit my site at: www.garthwaite.info

Why software development projects go wrong

Why software development projects go wrong

There are basically three types of software development projects:

  • those which are a success
  • those which struggle, but eventually come to a successful conclusion
  • those which fail

This article considers some of the factors which determine where projects go wrong.

In my experience, projects often go wrong right from the very beginning. It’s rarely caused by lack of skills. Most software development teams contain highly qualified, intelligent people, but things still sometimes go drastically wrong. Let’s consider why this could be.

Poor requirements

This is probably the major reason why projects go wrong. If the top-level requirements are not correct, it’s almost impossible for a project to succeed. In some projects, it’s fairly easy to determine the requirements. In others, especially projects which are particularly innovative, in can be very difficult. There is a lot of skill required in writing good software requirements.

Some reasons why the requirements are sometimes poor are described below.

Not considering the needs of all stakeholders

The stakeholders are all the people who will have contact with the product in some way. It’s easy to completely forget some stakeholders. For example, the people who are going to maintain the product are stakeholders, so their needs should be considered from the very start. It’s necessary to get the stakeholders to state their needs themselves. It’s not sufficient that the project members or team leader attempts to guess the needs of the stakeholders, because they almost certainly don’t have the specific knowledge of each stakeholder.

Gold plating – over engineering – adding too many features

It’s a tendency of many engineers (perhaps including myself in the past) to add too many features to the product. Most engineers want he customer to be happy with the final product and it is often assumed that this means adding as many features as possible. This is often not the case – the customer would prefer something simpler, which is easier to use. Occasionally, the customer himself is to blame for requesting too many features. I’ve experienced this in cases where the customer is requesting technical bids from several companies – they keep asking the supplier to add new features, without increasing the price, with the threat that the competition will win the tender if the extra features are not added.

Other reasons are listed below

  • Requirements which do not correspond to features the customer wants
  • Making the requirements too detailed
  • Mixing what should be separate requirements into one requirement
  • Mixing requirement levels, e.g. mixing up high and low-level
  • Missing requirements
  • Requirements which are not implementable
  • Requirements which are not testable
  • Teams which are too large
  • Giving programmers the task of writing requirements
  • Adding more people to a project which is already late
  • Not giving enough responsibility to individuals
  • Performing “big bang” integration
  • Not testing enough
  • Unrealistic time scales
  • Not taking the deadlines seriously